Section

Comparison

The comparison section has 2 layouts to choose from, and ships in 10 templates. Add it to any page from the editor and it takes on your site's type, colour and spacing, on every screen size.

What you do, how you work, what it looks like. The body of the page.

Layouts: 2
In templates: 10
Plan: All plans

2 of its layouts, rendered live

Real output from the engine that serves every published Pendro site, using content from the templates that ship this section.

us vs themas it ships in Bold Tech

Marlow & Sons

Get a Quote

How we compare

Marlow & Sons vs. building it yourself

Them

Roll your own

Time to first call
2–4 weeks
Type-safe SDK
Webhook delivery & retries
Build & maintain yourself
Observability
Wire to Datadog manually
Audit logs
DIY (often skipped)
On-call when things break
Your team
SOC 2 evidence
Months of work

Marlow & Sons

Time to first call
Under 5 minutes
Type-safe SDK
Webhook delivery & retries
Built in, with replay UI
Observability
Tracing & metrics out of the box
Audit logs
Immutable, exportable
On-call when things break
24/7 — by us
SOC 2 evidence
Provided on request

feature matrixas it ships in Project Showcase

Marlow & Sons

Get a Quote

Before and after

What actually changed

Measured across the two quarters after rollout against the two before discovery. Same sales team, same pricing, same product.

Feature	Before the rebuild	After rollout
How the company described itself	Internal IT tool	Platform of record
Inbound demos per month	61	84 +38%
Sales close rate	18%	21% +14% relative
Cost per acquisition	$4,100	$3,200 −22%
Time to first sales conversation	3 calls of explaining	Starts at the price
Marketing site templates	4, hand-built each time	11, tokenised, owned in-house
Who could ship a new page	Agency, 3 weeks	Their team, same day